3 ms·

You're saying that conferences should not place too much emphasis the party aspects, because that is not the purpose of a conference. Right? Well I'm saying t

by jlgreco 13y ago

You're saying that conferences should not place too much emphasis the party aspects, because that is not the purpose of a conference. Right? Well I'm saying that I think that is too imposing. It would be like me saying that bowling alleys should be careful not to place too much emphasis on drinking, because the purpose of a bowling alley is to compete with others at rolling a ball at things. Who am I to say that others shouldn't think that the purpose of bowling is to drink with friends while occasionally rolling a ball around? I shouldn't impose my idea of the purpose of bowling on other people. I hope it is clear what I mean.

teddyh 13y ago
I think you are doing the same faulty comparison you made with board games in another comment. The purpose of all those activities (party, board games, bowling) is to have fun. I'm saying that the very definition of a conference is that it has a different goal. Conferences can (and should, by all means possible) be as fun as possible, but with the goal of the conference taking slight precedence. Since having a party-like atmosphere will make people come to the conference, by all means conferences should have them. But one should keep in mind that the party-like atmosphere does not obscure or negate the purpose of the conference in the first place.
- jlgreco 13y ago
  " I'm saying that the very definition of a conference is that it has a different goal. ... the goal of the conference taking slight precedence." So long as you realize that this sentence is just a statement your own personal opinion, not some sort of universal truth about conferences, then I don't think we have any issue. The goal, or purpose, of a conference is something for organizers and participants to decide for themselves. (The answer to "You think maybe I should write a long-winded self-aggrandizing blog post about this culture of exclusion?" is "No you should not jlgreco, because that would make you (even more of) an insufferable cock.")
  - teddyh 13y ago
    Well, I guess it comes down to what the definition of “conference” is, I suppose.
    - cdcarter 13y ago
      Yes. That's why he opened his initial response with "perhaps your idea of what a conference is [...]"

by jlgreco 13y ago

teddyh 13y ago

I think you are doing the same faulty comparison you made with board games in another comment. The purpose of all those activities (party, board games, bowling) is to have fun. I'm saying that the very definition of a conference is that it has a different goal. Conferences can (and should, by all means possible) be as fun as possible, but with the goal of the conference taking slight precedence. Since having a party-like atmosphere will make people come to the conference, by all means conferences should have them. But one should keep in mind that the party-like atmosphere does not obscure or negate the purpose of the conference in the first place.

jlgreco 13y ago
" I'm saying that the very definition of a conference is that it has a different goal. ... the goal of the conference taking slight precedence." So long as you realize that this sentence is just a statement your own personal opinion, not some sort of universal truth about conferences, then I don't think we have any issue. The goal, or purpose, of a conference is something for organizers and participants to decide for themselves. (The answer to "You think maybe I should write a long-winded self-aggrandizing blog post about this culture of exclusion?" is "No you should not jlgreco, because that would make you (even more of) an insufferable cock.")
- teddyh 13y ago
  Well, I guess it comes down to what the definition of “conference” is, I suppose.
  - cdcarter 13y ago
    Yes. That's why he opened his initial response with "perhaps your idea of what a conference is [...]"