The IRS is just interpreting the law as they see it. At some point they have to draw the line between a tip and a wage, and they draw the line so that an "auto

The IRS is just interpreting the law as they see it. At some point they have to draw the line between a tip and a wage, and they draw the line so that an "automatic tip" is a wage. All the rest of the article is irrational garbage. The fair comparison is not between how the IRS treats waiters and how they treat billionaires, but rather how the IRS treats waiters of a certain yearly income, and how they treat other workers of the same income.