5 ms·
I translated your comment to Galician: Eu odio iso, cada vez que un artigo menciona un servizo ou cae dun enlace de afiliado e veredicto de alguén é que o
by biot 13y ago
I translated your comment to Galician:
Eu odio iso, cada vez que un artigo menciona un servizo ou cae dun
enlace de afiliado e veredicto de alguén é que o artigo parece
publicidade. Prefire o seu contido de lectura a ser desprovisto de
mencionar os produtos ou marcas? Se bloggers nunca facer un centavo
off ligazóns afiliados?
Estar preocupado co contido e só o contido. O artigo ten iso, é
lexítimo.
If you are curious about other languages, I encourage you to test it out on your own! You can sign-up for a demo account at https://translate-o-rama.io/ https://translate-o-rama.io/
- B-Con 13y agoThat's spam, not useful data. No one upvoted that hypothetical offering of data. People did find this article interesting. And hey, maybe I am interested in learning that language. Assuming your forum was appropriate (say, at a Galician convention), that could be a useful thing.
- biot 13y agoWith apologies to Arthur C. Clarke: Sufficiently advanced spam is indistinguishable from useful content.
- B-Con 13y agoThat's actually a good quote-analogy. I'm not the most pragmatic person ever, but let me pose this: If you can't tell the difference, do you honestly care?
- biot 13y agoIf the utility is high enough, then I might not mind. The problem is when the content's utility is insufficiently advanced and it is followed by a plug for a very related product/service that solves the problem identified in the content. That scenario casts suspicion on the content: "Did the author write this only to plug the product/service?". In this instance, the Dropbox info was sufficiently useful (it appeared to be an original discovery) that I don't see it as a huge problem.
- B-Con 13y agoThat's an entirely reasonable position.