3 ms·
That sounds extremely iffy to me. The "disturbance" may be short lived, and the space they take up may be a small portion of the island, but I find it hard to b
by mistercow 13y ago
That sounds extremely iffy to me. The "disturbance" may be short lived, and the space they take up may be a small portion of the island, but I find it hard to believe that the degree of disturbance caused by a rocket launch can be canceled out by its brevity.
- diminoten 13y agoIt can be put into other terms: The refuge gets a lot of money because of the NASA station there.
- ghc 13y agoWhy not? The latest statistics I could find say that about 22 launches per year happen there. At each launch pad there are probably only a fraction of those. But even if the disturbance is approximately 2 minutes long (a slowly rising rocket), that's less than 1 hour per year. I find it hard to believe that wildlife cannot cope with that.
- mistercow 13y agoMy understanding is that the noise from a rocket launch is so loud, even 10 miles away, that you have to shout over it to be heard. One mile from the launchpad, it's loud enough to damage your ears. Wallops Island is 6 square miles.
- snowwrestler 13y agoYour understanding is not accurate; I was 5 miles away from this launch and the low rumble was not loud enough to drown normal talking. Most launches from Wallops are sounding rockets, which are much smaller than the Minotaur. Which is itself much smaller than the Space Shuttle was.
- mistercow 13y agoAh, that makes a big difference then.
- snowwrestler 13y agoIf it wasn't a launch area it would probably not be a wildlife refuge, especially since there is already an existing refuge, Assateague Island, right next door. It would most likely be packed with vacation homes, just like the rest of the Mid-Atlantic shoreline. Disclaimer: I saw this launch from Assateague and it was awesome. I was too far away to see any flying frogs, but the mosquitos and bats did not seem too upset where I was.