3 ms·
A fairly arbitrary sampling of studies (there are many on more specific subjects, if you're interested in researching more specific aspects of the question): *
by _delirium 13y ago
A fairly arbitrary sampling of studies (there are many on more specific subjects, if you're interested in researching more specific aspects of the question):
* A general literature survey as of 1995, of the evidence on whether increasing the incomes of everyone (with no change in relative incomes) improves overall happiness: http://ibe.eller.arizona.edu/docs/2010/Martinsson/easterlin95.pdf http://ibe.eller.arizona.edu/docs/2010/Martinsson/easterlin9...
* Income inequality and happiness 1972-2008 in the U.S. and causal hypotheses: http://inside.bard.edu/~luka/documents/Oishi-Kesebir-Diener-InequalityandHappiness-PsychScience.pdf http://inside.bard.edu/~luka/documents/Oishi-Kesebir-Diener-...
* Relationship between regional inequality, happiness, and confounding factors in Japan: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953610000791 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953610...
* Empirical alignment of utilitarian happiness-maximization and other desiderata often seen as opposed: http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/22129/JHS_11_2010_605.pdf http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/22129/JHS_11_2010_605.pdf
- yummyfajitas 13y agoThese are more of the same - vague correlations without any causal analysis. The ones based on happiness surveys are even worse, since there is no way to know whether a score of 7 happiness points (on a scale of 1 to 10, or whatever the scale of the survey is) for someone in Denmark in 1976 is comparable to a score of 7 happiness points for someone in Japan in 1996.
- _delirium 13y agoIncorrect— they have causal analysis.