I believe the argument is: Today people without money are not happy because life itself requires resources, that many people do not have, to be happy and healt

I believe the argument is: Today people without money are not happy because life itself requires resources, that many people do not have, to be happy and healthy. Tomorrow people without money could be happy and healthy because many of the things that make them so will require less resources to access. One example given in the interview I heard is that eventually you'll be able to get a good education for free from the Internet. Once people accept that premise, then spending big money on a college education isn't as necessary. But then, it's the future so who knows what will happen since the future doesn't exist yet.