3 ms·
No you didn't get my analogy. The parent comment was stating the point that Putin was making it illegal himself by vetoing and retracting the veto would have m
by carlob 13y ago
No you didn't get my analogy.
The parent comment was stating the point that Putin was making it illegal himself by vetoing and retracting the veto would have made it legal. The same thing happens in sex, if you consent to it, it's ok; if you don't, it's rape. That's the mechanism of consent and of veto.
In your analogy there is no way the white bus passenger could instantly change the law by consenting to the black man sitting in the wrong section. It is illegal regardless of his opinion.
In sex as in international diplomacy you need unanimity (at least of the security council).
- varjag 13y agoYour analogy is just as flawed since Assad has no say as to consent or veto. All is being decided by the five nations in power (the white people of diplomacy). Per your analogy, Russia is not an agent on either side. The whole analogy business in arguments is one witty exercise in strawman.