11 ms·
Surely at least some of the fired could've been retrained and given a second chance? I agree it would be more fair to include also the number of retrained peop
by polskibus 13y ago
Surely at least some of the fired could've been retrained and given a second chance? I agree it would be more fair to include also the number of retrained people (ie. that were retrained and saved from being laid off). Unfortunately, the article also fails to mention the demanded immigration levels.
Retraining would possibly be more expensive than hiring from abroad speaking short-term, but probably more beneficial to the economy as a whole.
- dragonwriter 13y ago> Surely at least some of the fired could've been retrained and given a second chance? Experience has probably shown employers that its cheaper in the long term to just lobby for an immigration-centered subsidy, so they prefer that option.