The title is misleading. It seems the point of the article is there is so much noise in the statistical gathering of data, that nothing can be determined. Ther

The title is misleading. It seems the point of the article is there is so much noise in the statistical gathering of data, that nothing can be determined. There is no smoking gun as to the cause of cancer, and it appears it has been with vertebrates at least since the Jurassic period. My self-appointed cancer avoidance system consists of: avoid factory foods as much as possible, avoid factory produced chemicals as much as possible (including shampoo or sun screen, counterintuitive I know), avoid high energy particles as much as possible, avoid potential heavy metal contamination as much as possible.