5 ms·
The weird bit is the NYT did it on their own website instead of Ars. It's also super classy of Ars to cite a second report by the NYT then link to their own su
by benologist 13y ago
The weird bit is the NYT did it on their own website instead of Ars. It's also super classy of Ars to cite a second report by the NYT then link to their own summary of that article too!
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/10/government-announces-steps-to-restore-confidence-on-encryption-standards/?src=twrhp&_r=0 http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/10/government-announce...
- pdknsk 13y agoThe original NYT article was submitted, but barely upvoted. http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6364340 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6364340
- runn1ng 13y agonow the original link was changes to NYTimes anyway
- devx 13y agoMike Masnick calls it a complete non-response from NIST, regarding the real issue/accusation: http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130910/12371124473/nists-ridiculous-non-response-response-to-revelation-that-nsa-controlled-crypto-standards-process.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130910/12371124473/nists-...
- anigbrowl 13y agoWhen was Mike Masnick last happy about anything?