4 ms·
Generally speaking, because some regulatory agency or other would refuse or revoke certification of a device that has a "disable radio" feature that doesn't wor
by jasomill 13y ago
Generally speaking, because some regulatory agency or other would refuse or revoke certification of a device that has a "disable radio" feature that doesn't work.
I wouldn't assume that a device is incapable of accumulating GPS tracking information in "airplane mode" and forwarding it when the radio is turned back on, however, or that intelligence and law enforcement agencies would never quietly disable "airplane mode" in the course of specific investigations.
- krallja 13y agoIt's fun to see that you trust your government to regulate the "disable radio" feature! </g>
- brown9-2 13y agoThe same government that backdoored the phone?
- oakwhiz 13y agoAirplane mode more or less disables the phone's transmitters, but not necessarily the receivers. Even if the baseband processor is told to shut down the radio, it can still be listening for a remote backdoor message, and subsequently enable the transmitter for some nefarious purpose - similar to a remote shell.
- baddox 13y agoThere are also agencies which regulate privacy concerns, like the FCC. Why would one agency be more trustworthy than another?
- mixmastamyk 13y agoThere's a branch of philosophy that takes this to your conclusion... we can't really trust anything in this world. However, while the NSA has surely overstepped its bounds I don't believe it is omnipotent. At some point its influence ends. I'm still willing to believe in airplane mode. Perhaps next week's scoop will change that, but for now I'm somewhat confident it works.