3 ms·
If you're just removing part of the image after cutting around it with a tool like this, having the object interpreted as 3D isn't really going to be of any ben
by pwny 13y ago
If you're just removing part of the image after cutting around it with a tool like this, having the object interpreted as 3D isn't really going to be of any benefit.
The impressive thing here, imho, is the seemingly effortless and seamless transition and replacement. The background is fixed and the surface texture is stretched in what seems like real time.
- jack-r-abbit 13y agoYes... I know the 3D part is the more impressive part. But I was also impressed with its ability to back fill the background.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]