5 ms·
The sensor is epi-dermal, which means reads underneath the skin, so it does not solely rely on seeing the prints. There is a steel ring, which probably senses c
by iamshs 13y ago
The sensor is epi-dermal, which means reads underneath the skin, so it does not solely rely on seeing the prints. There is a steel ring, which probably senses capacitance. Will there be exploits? Probably. Are Apple engineers incompetent to think of obvious exploits? I would put my money on NO.
In any case, I would like to see the evolution of this tech.
- hornbaker 13y agoThe prefix "epi" means above or on top. Perhaps you're thinking of "hypodermal," which means underneath the skin.
- iamshs 13y agoTrue. It should be sub-dermal, but I do not know the workings of sensor and epidermal was mentioned on Apple's slide.
- ars 13y ago> Will there be exploits? Probably. Not just probably, but definitely and easily. > Are Apple engineers incompetent to think of obvious exploits? I would put my money on NO. They may have thought of them, but they didn't solve them for the very simple reason that it's impossible to solve them. A fingerprint is only secure for causal use (someone picking up your phone), but it's worthless for any more security than that. It's like the face recognition on an android phone - good for causal use, but easily defeated.
- ris 13y ago"Are Apple engineers incompetent to think of obvious exploits? I would put my money on NO." They certainly didn't seem to test whether a phone would get acceptable reception if held in a rather common way.
- stock_toaster 13y agothis likely came out of their purchase of AuthenTec last year.
- manmal 13y agoAFAIK capacitance of your skin can change very frequently and rapidly. Drink too little for two days -> skin dry -> resistance goes up steeply. Even using a touchpad for an hour might dry your skin up (sidenote: I sometimes even have to moisten my fingers so my MBP touchpad registers my touches well).
- iamshs 13y agoThank you for this information. Forgot that capacitance varies and depends on variety of factors. I was speculating about the steel ring.
- johansch 13y agoA few years ago, some students from my local university went around to all of the fingerprint solution companies that were exhibiting at the CeBIT fair. All of the products that the respective companies agreed to be challenged were in fact fooled by something that originated as a fingerprint on a drinking glass.
- iamshs 13y agoIphone will be out soon, pretty sure hacking/fooling fingerprint sensor is top priority for lot of people. So we will see if this common methods works on not.