That's exactly what I mean. The collection is the problem, but the court ruled on the phrase "readily accessible to the general public" (to be fair, though, tha

That's exactly what I mean. The collection is the problem, but the court ruled on the phrase "readily accessible to the general public" (to be fair, though, that was the basis of the motion to dismiss and it would have been a stretch to expand the ruling). Anyone accessing an open wifi point is seeing other people's traffic. It's looking at it and storing it that seems to be the problem, but that's not the distinction the wiretap act makes.