3 ms·
While the paradigm of having a webhook makes more sense, I personally hate working with them. I've yet to see a graceful way of handling local development that
by lojack 13y ago
While the paradigm of having a webhook makes more sense, I personally hate working with them. I've yet to see a graceful way of handling local development that doesn't involve localtunnel (or some alternative) and constantly having to un-register and re-register endpoints every time localtunnel gives you a new hostname. I understand the point and would prefer working with them if there was just a good way to handle local development.
- bryanh 13y agoThis is a great point, is there a better way to do local dev with webhooks? I always used localtunnel which is great it not perfect.
- johns 13y agoSome other options here: http://john-sheehan.com/blog/a-survey-of-the-localhost-proxying-landscape http://john-sheehan.com/blog/a-survey-of-the-localhost-proxy... I personally think you should be using one that gives you permanent URLs (ngrok or Passageway) but that also keeps a log when you're client is disconnected. I'm pretty sure only our Passageway does that.