4 ms·
Right, actual, physical electrons move about as fast as sap in a conductor. I'm sure the OP meant the speed of electric charge, while still not moving at c, it
by yan 17y ago
Right, actual, physical electrons move about as fast as sap in a conductor. I'm sure the OP meant the speed of electric charge, while still not moving at c, it is a decent fraction of it.
Two second explanation that I'm sure everyone knows: When you imagine a conductor to be a pipe full of electrons that are all annoyed at other electrons, once you pop another one in from one side, that annoyance (charge) percolates up to the other end and pushes an electron out from the other side. This is what people claim is actually moving at close to c, not the physical electrons. Electrons are matter and thus can't come close to c. This is why AC is a lot more efficient at transmitting electricity: with alternating current, you push and pull a couple of electrons from each side really fast, and the 'meat' of the charge isn't moving more than an infinitely small distance. When you have a current flow that never changes polarity, you're always pushing charge in the same direction.
- raganwald 17y agoWhat I find really interesting is the relationship between conducting 'electricity" and conducting heat. Why is the property of electrical conductivity closely correlated with the property of heat conductivity? http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0521456606?ie=UTF8&tag=raganwald001-20 http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0521456606?ie=UTF8&tag=...
- Retric 17y agoI think the most general answer is density, but there are actually several indecent properties’ that change the rate of the propagation of both heat and electricity. Copper becomes a better electrical conductor as it cools. However, hydrogen is a far better conductor as plasma than as a cooler gas. Yet heating things tends to increase their ability to conduct heat.
- 10ren 17y agoIt's like sound: the air isn't moving that fast.