4 ms·
Dead Simple Rails Deployment
- pibefision 17y agoWhat's the news? Deployon passenger using git's its not new.
- dennmart 17y agoThe article doesn't say that this is new. It simply specifies how easy it is to deploy Rails apps on Passenger.
- abyssknight 17y agoArticle is blocked here at the office, but since playing with the Passenger/Capistrano/SVN workflow I don't think it gets much more simple than: svn commit -m "Added stuff." cap:deploy
- csbartus 17y agoI hope the article wasn't deployed with Rails, right now the site is down.
- sant0sk1 17y agoooh how embarrassing. Looks like my little DreamHost account can't handle even trivial traffic :( I thought I had wp-super-cache enabled but maybe not. I'm giving it a reboot now so we'll see if that fixes things.
- csbartus 17y agoI know, also working with Rails but couldn't miss it :D
- sant0sk1 17y agoNo worries, your joke gave me a chuckle too. Looks like my wp-super-cache plugin is not working properly so every time the page is requested it regenerates the cache. No idea why but its pretty much killing the server.
- tom 17y agoWhy not just rsync -auvz? Avoiding a small bit of initial frustration in setting up Capistrano, SSH keys etc, in order to have what feels like an easier deploy is a wonderful case of penny wise and pound foolish. Take the time, do it right, get the benefits of a real deployment. It's worth it.
- JeremyChase 17y agoI essentially do the same thing as the author, but use a shell script on the server. Locally I do this 'git push repo master' then on the remote machine I run 'update.sh' which is here: http://pastie.org/496681 http://pastie.org/496681 I tend to think that if you are going to bother with Capistrano you should go all the way..
- jcapote 17y agoHave you heard of heroku.com
- matthewking 17y agoNot sure how capistrano can be called painful, all you have to type is 'cap deploy', then you have migrations, rollbacks etc all part of it.