3 ms·
I see what you mean, but you miss an important point. Reversible transactions must be reversed by a human intermediary. An insurance company, a financial insti
by oleganza 13y ago
I see what you mean, but you miss an important point.
Reversible transactions must be reversed by a human intermediary. An insurance company, a financial institution, someone who you must trust this way or another. In addition to obvious value (that you described), this also creates all sorts of issues we all know about: fraud, regulatory hassle, spying, freezing of accounts etc.
Bitcoin as a protocol (or any alternative money-moving protocol for that matter) itself cannot reverse anything. It's just a protocol. Anyone can set up their own BitcoinPayPal and mediate Bitcoin transactions and reverse them as they like.
The value of Bitcoin is that you can opt in insured reversible transactions based on trust if you want to. But that's not necessary. USD is limited precisely because you have no other way to move it across the internet without trusting intermediaries that might reverse the transaction. Bitcoin simply gives you all possibilities, USD gives you less.
There's nothing impossible in having eBay to act as an escrow for BTC transactions just like with USD. But the power of BTC is that you can ultimately own it, while USD must be always stored in someone else's hands.
- Nursie 13y agoI'm not sure it's correct to say BTC gives you all possibilities yet, though those services could be built. It may be a while before they are built because the bitcoin community in general seem to be violently against reversible transactions as a concept. As for 'owning' BTC, the concept is entertaining. BTC is an entry in a public ledger, you own the private key to access it, but it's very hard to say where exactly a BTC is at any given time.