4 ms·

Does that happen with non permanent structures? I don't count the problems as ignored. They're actually not relevant for the intended use case.

• fusiongyro 13y ago
  From the article: > If I want to spend my time writing blog posts, exploring new programming languages, and other things that I want to do but I am unlikely to get paid for, it’s helpful to opt out of certain common expenses. Housing is a major expense that is ripe for pruning. I'd say "the intended use case" here is clearly to replace your primary residence, which is both what makes the project interesting and what casts the ignored topics in sharp relief.
  • grannyg00se 13y ago
    You can replace your primary residence and at the same time change your lifestyle expectation. From the article: "If you are considering a canvas dome, teepee, or yurt you should consider building a frameless dome as well." I'd say that if you're considering replacing your primary residence with a teepee, you're looking at certain lifestyle expectation that don't necessarily include building codes.
    • nathan_long 13y ago
      You're probably also looking at a lifestyle that makes it difficult to "explore new programming languages." For that, you'll need to live in a city, so you can go poop and charge your laptop somewhere nearby, in which case building codes are relevant.