3 ms·

I won't argue for the aesthetics, but I am curious what you mean by "loss of generality."

• breckinloggins 13y ago
  Perhaps that was worded wrong, but what I meant was the idea that you have names that map to things, and that you have an evaluation order for those things. So that if you see (foo a b c) and it isn't quoted, we know that foo will be resolved and evaluated, so will a, b, and c, and then the objects to which a, b, and c resolved will be applied to the object to which foo was resolved. So, if I then type (a foo b c), we get the same behavior with different object resolutions. And that should work everywhere, all the time.