3 ms·

I'm sorry but that was a load of horse-sh*t. Meaningless.

• coldtea 13y ago
  Perhaps you should have studied more? It definitely has meaning, and actually quite trivial at that.
  • chm 13y ago
    I'm a MSc student in theoretical chemistry. I'm not a world-class professor, but neither an uneducated peasant. I meant what I wrote. "Chemically modified graphene" is a tad ambiguous, but adding "nanostructure" is a pleonasm. And calling their area "microscale" is not only wrong, but misleading. Leaving the electrical properties part alone, I can only laugh at "modifiable chemical functionality". "Biodevice" is a somewhat clear concept and yes, graphene has potential applications in the field. But what does "bio" have to do in "biocellular and biomolecular scale"? Fancy words but not much meaning.
    • adamio 13y ago
      Actually OC's sentence is a quote from this paper http://www.che.ksu.edu/~vberry/papers/Berry-NanoLetters-graphene-biosensors.pdf http://www.che.ksu.edu/~vberry/papers/Berry-NanoLetters-grap...
      • chm 13y ago
        Ha! I still think it's jibber-jabber.