thanks for the link. fyi, it doesn't go where you wanted it to. your (2002) annotation is being interpreted as part of it. unmangled version: http://www.geek.c

thanks for the link. fyi, it doesn't go where you wanted it to. your (2002) annotation is being interpreted as part of it. unmangled version: http://www.geek.com/chips/palladium-microsofts-big-plan-for-the-pc-549258/ http://www.geek.com/chips/palladium-microsofts-big-plan-for-...