3 ms·
Not sure if you guys have noticed this "In 2006, he forgot to pay a $134 tax bill, prompting the city to place a lien on the home and add $183 in interest and p
by djvu9 13y ago
Not sure if you guys have noticed this "In 2006, he forgot to pay a $134 tax bill, prompting the city to place a lien on the home and add $183 in interest and penalties. His son paid the $317 bill in 2009, records show, but that wasn’t enough." His son did pay the tax later. I don't know how penalties/government fees are made and justified.
- westicle 13y agoThe writing is horribly obfuscated. What it means to say is that the original bill was $134. Presumably he received dozens of notices and warnings that it needed to be paid, before it was sold as a lien. The lien holder would then have sent notices and warnings that the debt needed to be paid. Eventually after no response, it filed foreclosure proceedings in the court (at some significant cost). At that point, the son decided to pay the original tax bill, however the holder of the lien presumably wanted its legal costs paid before it would surrender the lien. What happened next was very unjust. But would make more sense if the article was clear on the timeline of events.