4 ms·
This is my experience of oDesk, from someone who has spent 6 figures with them. A few years ago I contracted a developer from the largest agency on oDesk at th
by RafiqM 13y ago
This is my experience of oDesk, from someone who has spent 6 figures with them.
A few years ago I contracted a developer from the largest agency on oDesk at the time, based in India.
This developer had a masters degree, tons of experience, and had a daily rate significantly higher than the average. Things worked out so well that I increased the team to 7 people total from this same company.
After about 8 months, the quality of work fell dramatically.
I ended up cancelling the contracts a few months after that, and found out something shocking from the ex project manager:
The developers I had hired had been switched out for junior level devs. Some of the developers I hired didn't even work for that company anymore. I had none of my original hires, and didn't know it.
They had been communicating with me under the previous names and email addresses. I had wondered why they so often "forgot" things that I had told them 6 months ago.
I was told this was a common practice in large agencies.
The problem: Inadequate accountability, even with screenshots or videos.
Is this problem specific to oDesk? No, not at all. But it's turned me off "per-hour" contracts altogether, and now I only outsource very small, highly scoped, pay-on-delivery projects.
- rwhitman 13y agoYikes, thats an alarming story. The fact that they were deliberately asking junior developers to impersonate senior developers using the same email addresses etc is a really worrisome practice. I had a situation managing a team for a client a while back where developers suddenly turned awful, and I'm now suspicious this could have been the case. Do you know if this is widespread with other companies?
- mtrimpe 13y agoFrom my experience working with a major Indian outsourcing company at a previous employer this seems common practice across the board. In fact the more tolerant managers experienced this transition very quickly and managers that stayed constantly vigilant managed to stave it off for a bit longer; but also not indefinitely. From my perspective it seemed to be that this extended bait-and-switch was what their business model was built on.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]