4 ms·

I don't know what the point of going to a conference is, if you can get videos of the talks afterwards, like TED.

ramchip 17y ago
Networking. Meeting people. It's very important in scientific research to present your research, see others' work and exchange ideas. Conferences are a good way to do it. I guess hackers and programmers are quited used to doing this over the web, though.
ciscoriordan 17y ago
Getting to talk to speakers, meeting people, swag.
ori_b 17y ago
Participating. Talking to the people, exchanging ideas, having a beer with them, convincing them to do things your way because your ideas don't suck, and so on. Conferences aren't so much about the presentations as what happens after the presentations. Of course, this guy is a VC, and he's not so interested in the technical scene. He also seems to be talking about invitation only conferences, which are slightly silly.
alain94040 17y ago
There is a huge difference between watching the talks and actually being there. 50% of the value is the content of the talks, which supposedly described the latest and greatest. Just like in academia, the talks are actually dated: they have been prepared months before and don't really represent the latest. To know the latest, you need to chat with various people to find out what they are working on right now, that they can't quite announce yet. What's on stage is canned, in a sense. If you want to be in, you got to be there in person to catch where the future is. This has held true for me both in academia (research) and web 2.0.
- ankhmoop 17y ago
  Given that the talks are canned, and the materials they are based on are almost always published, why should I pay for a conference when I can already leverage existing networking/social channels to stay in touch with the latest?
  - kscaldef 17y ago
    It's hard to go out for a beer with someone who isn't in the same place that you are. And people will definitely tell you stuff over a beer or two that they won't write about in their blog.
    - ankhmoop 17y ago
      You don't need a conference to go out for a beer, and you certainly don't need an exclusive conference to go out for a beer with someone interesting. You do need a way to gather interesting people in one place, but you don't need a traditional conference (especially an expensive conference) to do so.
- jseifer 17y ago
  This may be true for TED (never been) but for most tech conferences I've spoken at the presenters are still putting together slides for their presentation right up until they talk. This tends to get the latest stuff in. Not to say I'm disagreeing with you -- quite the opposite, in fact. With rare exception, during most of the conferences I've been to the "hallway track" has been more valuable/informative.

Networking. Meeting people. It's very important in scientific research to present your research, see others' work and exchange ideas. Conferences are a good way to do it. I guess hackers and programmers are quited used to doing this over the web, though.

ciscoriordan 17y ago

Getting to talk to speakers, meeting people, swag.

ori_b 17y ago

Participating. Talking to the people, exchanging ideas, having a beer with them, convincing them to do things your way because your ideas don't suck, and so on. Conferences aren't so much about the presentations as what happens after the presentations. Of course, this guy is a VC, and he's not so interested in the technical scene. He also seems to be talking about invitation only conferences, which are slightly silly.

alain94040 17y ago

There is a huge difference between watching the talks and actually being there. 50% of the value is the content of the talks, which supposedly described the latest and greatest. Just like in academia, the talks are actually dated: they have been prepared months before and don't really represent the latest. To know the latest, you need to chat with various people to find out what they are working on right now, that they can't quite announce yet. What's on stage is canned, in a sense. If you want to be in, you got to be there in person to catch where the future is. This has held true for me both in academia (research) and web 2.0.

ankhmoop 17y ago
Given that the talks are canned, and the materials they are based on are almost always published, why should I pay for a conference when I can already leverage existing networking/social channels to stay in touch with the latest?
- kscaldef 17y ago
  It's hard to go out for a beer with someone who isn't in the same place that you are. And people will definitely tell you stuff over a beer or two that they won't write about in their blog.
  - ankhmoop 17y ago
    You don't need a conference to go out for a beer, and you certainly don't need an exclusive conference to go out for a beer with someone interesting. You do need a way to gather interesting people in one place, but you don't need a traditional conference (especially an expensive conference) to do so.
jseifer 17y ago
This may be true for TED (never been) but for most tech conferences I've spoken at the presenters are still putting together slides for their presentation right up until they talk. This tends to get the latest stuff in. Not to say I'm disagreeing with you -- quite the opposite, in fact. With rare exception, during most of the conferences I've been to the "hallway track" has been more valuable/informative.