3 ms·
A 39" 4K has a 113 ppi (http://pixensity.com/list/seiki-digital-se39uy04-430/ http://pixensity.com/list/seiki-digital-se39uy04-430/) A 13" Macbook retina has a
by continuations 13y ago
A 39" 4K has a 113 ppi (http://pixensity.com/list/seiki-digital-se39uy04-430/ http://pixensity.com/list/seiki-digital-se39uy04-430/)
A 13" Macbook retina has a 227 ppi.
So even a 4K 39" monitor still has a far lower ppi than a retina display. And I absolutely can tell a retina display from a normal display. That means there's a lot of room for resolution to go up to and beyond 4K before it becomes indistinguishable to human eyes.
And I stand right by the monitor when I use my computer. Right now my monitor is about 12" away from my face.
- mangotree 13y agoMost people do not stand so close to their tv.
- 3825 13y agoNo, but we absolutely stand that close to our monitors. The original poster wants a monitor. the child comment talked about a tv. Correct me if I am wrong but HDMI (before 2) cannot deliver 4k at 240Hz, right? Has that changed with the current iteration?
- continuations 13y agoI'm talking about monitor