4 ms·

Prepare For The Facebook Vanity URL Landrush

27 points by peter123 17y ago

zach 17y ago
Is it weird that I still don't use GMail much because my customary username (not this one) was taken by the time I finagled an invite? I don't really have a second choice, so I just stick with Yahoo! Mail. I guess I'm more vain than I think...
- tomjen 17y ago
  Depends - I hate having to keep track of a thousand different usernames, so I think it makes sense to stick to one.
  - andyking 17y ago
    My name's ever so common - it's taken in all the popular domain extensions, all the major email services, most of the social sites (I got in early on Twitter!). It's a pain; I don't want to use a "nickname" and I really don't want numbers at the end of my name. Then again, because so many people share my name, I'm barely traceable on Google which I quite like. (It's the reason I use the startup email provider Zenbe. They had my name available. I just hope they don't go tits up!)
    - baddox 17y ago
      My name's not too common, Thomas Shaddox, but the problem is, a domain will noticably have "ass" in it. ;) I've toyed around with buying tomshaddox.com, but I really don't want to go by "Tom," but I do have tshaddox.com for now.
- axod 17y ago
  OTOH, If it's a commonish name/nick, you have to endure countless incorrect emails from people who have you confused with someone else.
  - johns 17y ago
    I don't have a particularly unique name, but I get 5-10 emails to the wrong people per week.
- Raphael 17y ago
  You could use Gmail with your own domain name.
  - zach 17y ago
    I did end up setting up my startup domain with GMail. It made me want to make a "regular" GMail account, but I still couldn't get past the name thing.
Shamiq 17y ago
Should Facebook sell vanity URLs? If they do, should they allow a secondary market?
- andrewl-hn 17y ago
  Russian Facebook clone (Vkontakte.ru) sells vanity URLs for a price about 1k euros. I'm not sure about the official reselling policy, though.
- staticshock 17y ago
  Surprisingly, I'm not finding much evidence of a myspace url market. Has anyone seen anything high profile, like a url getting sold for 1k?
edd 17y ago
I know in the tech community its nice to be able to link together all of your different 'profiles' so that people can find them. However, I really don't see this as being a feature that 'normal' people will use. When was the last time you actually visited someone's profile page without following a link for them off either your news feed or a friends profile? Unless Facebook's game is to try and move away from the 'friendship' model and open the whole system up.
- andymoe 17y ago
  Of course people are going to use it; you don't think the type of people that like to collect "friends" are going to put up a vanity URL?
  - mcav 17y ago
    Some will use it; most won't. Facebook search works well enough to satisfy most users' needs when actual hyperlinks aren't available.
- pj 17y ago
  When you want to visit Facebook itself, do you type in http://69.63.184.142/ http://69.63.184.142/ or http://www.facebook.com http://www.facebook.com? User friendly will win in the end.
  - deleted 17y ago
    [deleted]
    - deleted 17y ago
      [deleted]
  - gnaritas 17y ago
    Neither, I click the facebook bookmark on my toolbar.
  - baddox 17y ago
    My argument against Facebook vanity url's is that Facebook was originally designed to be for people who were actual friends irl. They could easily search for and add one another, and there was so need to give out static url's because there was no real public information other than a bit of profile info and a picture for search purposed.
nazgulnarsil 17y ago
I call facebook.com/myspace
pj 17y ago
If Facebook really cared about their users, this feature would have been available a long time ago.
TweedHeads 17y ago
I wish I could downvote propaganda.
huhtenberg 17y ago
peter123, what's up with the tracking stuff in the URL ? www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/31/prepare-for-the-facebook-vanity-url-landrush/?awesm=tcrn.ch_2tJ&utm_campaign=techcrunch&utm_content=techcrunch-autopost&utm_medium=tcrn.ch-twitter&utm_source=direct-tcrn.ch
- riklomas 17y ago
  It looks like Techcrunch are using a URL shortening tool at http://awe.sm http://awe.sm for their http://tcrn.ch http://tcrn.ch domain. The utm_* is for Google Analytics tracking. I imagine peter123 didn't mean to submit the whole URL, but just got to the article through the shortener
sho 17y ago
Fuck facebook. No seriously, who gives a shit.
- sho 17y ago
  I guess I have an answer to my rhetorical question: those modding me down give a shit : D
zackattack 17y ago
I could see this being useful if Facebook evolves into more of a LinkedIn; people could put their Facebook URLs onto their business cards. Also, when I meet a stranger, it would definitely be easier to find them if I could just go directly to their vanity URL, which might be more mnemonically accessible.
baddox 17y ago
This doesn't seem in the spirit of what Facebook is (or perhaps was). The idea with Facebook for the average user was that only your friends (i.e. actual friends irl) could see your full profile, and others searching for you would just see a bit of info and a picture. Of course, that's changing now with celebrity and corporate fan pages, so I'm sure they're just trying to adapt, but I think they're getting away from the service they originally provided. I suppose to do that is to risk failure while hoping for the reward of becoming a broader service.

27 points by peter123 17y ago

zach 17y ago

Is it weird that I still don't use GMail much because my customary username (not this one) was taken by the time I finagled an invite? I don't really have a second choice, so I just stick with Yahoo! Mail. I guess I'm more vain than I think...

tomjen 17y ago
Depends - I hate having to keep track of a thousand different usernames, so I think it makes sense to stick to one.
- andyking 17y ago
  My name's ever so common - it's taken in all the popular domain extensions, all the major email services, most of the social sites (I got in early on Twitter!). It's a pain; I don't want to use a "nickname" and I really don't want numbers at the end of my name. Then again, because so many people share my name, I'm barely traceable on Google which I quite like. (It's the reason I use the startup email provider Zenbe. They had my name available. I just hope they don't go tits up!)
  - baddox 17y ago
    My name's not too common, Thomas Shaddox, but the problem is, a domain will noticably have "ass" in it. ;) I've toyed around with buying tomshaddox.com, but I really don't want to go by "Tom," but I do have tshaddox.com for now.
axod 17y ago
OTOH, If it's a commonish name/nick, you have to endure countless incorrect emails from people who have you confused with someone else.
- johns 17y ago
  I don't have a particularly unique name, but I get 5-10 emails to the wrong people per week.
Raphael 17y ago
You could use Gmail with your own domain name.
- zach 17y ago
  I did end up setting up my startup domain with GMail. It made me want to make a "regular" GMail account, but I still couldn't get past the name thing.

Shamiq 17y ago

Should Facebook sell vanity URLs? If they do, should they allow a secondary market?

andrewl-hn 17y ago
Russian Facebook clone (Vkontakte.ru) sells vanity URLs for a price about 1k euros. I'm not sure about the official reselling policy, though.
staticshock 17y ago
Surprisingly, I'm not finding much evidence of a myspace url market. Has anyone seen anything high profile, like a url getting sold for 1k?

edd 17y ago

I know in the tech community its nice to be able to link together all of your different 'profiles' so that people can find them. However, I really don't see this as being a feature that 'normal' people will use. When was the last time you actually visited someone's profile page without following a link for them off either your news feed or a friends profile? Unless Facebook's game is to try and move away from the 'friendship' model and open the whole system up.

andymoe 17y ago
Of course people are going to use it; you don't think the type of people that like to collect "friends" are going to put up a vanity URL?
- mcav 17y ago
  Some will use it; most won't. Facebook search works well enough to satisfy most users' needs when actual hyperlinks aren't available.
pj 17y ago
When you want to visit Facebook itself, do you type in http://69.63.184.142/ http://69.63.184.142/ or http://www.facebook.com http://www.facebook.com? User friendly will win in the end.
- deleted 17y ago
  [deleted]
  - deleted 17y ago
    [deleted]
- gnaritas 17y ago
  Neither, I click the facebook bookmark on my toolbar.
- baddox 17y ago
  My argument against Facebook vanity url's is that Facebook was originally designed to be for people who were actual friends irl. They could easily search for and add one another, and there was so need to give out static url's because there was no real public information other than a bit of profile info and a picture for search purposed.

nazgulnarsil 17y ago

I call facebook.com/myspace

pj 17y ago

If Facebook really cared about their users, this feature would have been available a long time ago.

TweedHeads 17y ago

I wish I could downvote propaganda.

huhtenberg 17y ago

peter123, what's up with the tracking stuff in the URL ? www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/31/prepare-for-the-facebook-vanity-url-landrush/?awesm=tcrn.ch_2tJ&utm_campaign=techcrunch&utm_content=techcrunch-autopost&utm_medium=tcrn.ch-twitter&utm_source=direct-tcrn.ch

riklomas 17y ago
It looks like Techcrunch are using a URL shortening tool at http://awe.sm http://awe.sm for their http://tcrn.ch http://tcrn.ch domain. The utm_* is for Google Analytics tracking. I imagine peter123 didn't mean to submit the whole URL, but just got to the article through the shortener

sho 17y ago

Fuck facebook. No seriously, who gives a shit.

sho 17y ago
I guess I have an answer to my rhetorical question: those modding me down give a shit : D

zackattack 17y ago

I could see this being useful if Facebook evolves into more of a LinkedIn; people could put their Facebook URLs onto their business cards. Also, when I meet a stranger, it would definitely be easier to find them if I could just go directly to their vanity URL, which might be more mnemonically accessible.

baddox 17y ago

This doesn't seem in the spirit of what Facebook is (or perhaps was). The idea with Facebook for the average user was that only your friends (i.e. actual friends irl) could see your full profile, and others searching for you would just see a bit of info and a picture. Of course, that's changing now with celebrity and corporate fan pages, so I'm sure they're just trying to adapt, but I think they're getting away from the service they originally provided. I suppose to do that is to risk failure while hoping for the reward of becoming a broader service.