3 ms·
actually yeah, what you're talking about is something called checks and balances, where the bad is mitigated as much as possible. Even in your situation where
by rtpg 13y ago
actually yeah, what you're talking about is something called checks and balances, where the bad is mitigated as much as possible.
Even in your situation where government works in its own benefit, these are conflicting:
- The executive wants the data logging because it makes investigations easier , so less police work
- The judicial would not want this because it would make more open and shut cases, those reducing the need for workforce there
Even here , by applying your logic, checks and balances work
- mseebach 13y agoThat would be a wholly more convincing argument had checks and balances actually prevented the data retention directive and the NSA excesses. They didn't. Now what?