3 ms·

It kind of sounds like saying: "Why should I learn math, I will never use it anyway." It might be true, but that is not a good excuse for not learning it. And i

by jeena 13y ago

It kind of sounds like saying: "Why should I learn math, I will never use it anyway." It might be true, but that is not a good excuse for not learning it. And it is not like using semantic HTML is in any way more work or something, it at least has the benefit of being easier to read and thus maintain.

c2prods 13y ago
The code is just cleaner with HTML5 markup. I've updated the project, it's more readable this way :)
tuxracer 13y ago
That's very different. Because there are circumstances where not knowing or applying math is a barrier to accomplishing something. Saying "Why should I learn math, I will never use it anyway." means you're banking on the odds that you will never run into those circumstances. However when it comes to semantic HTML there is no circumstance where you are unable to move forward because you used <div> instead of <figcaption>. In fact thanks to the sometimes ambiguous descriptions of which semantic tag is appropriate you may find you used the wrong semantic tag which is arguably worse than not using a semantic tag at all. And at the end of the day after carefully cross referencing and/or memorizing which semantic tag to use throughout your markup zero real world, practical effect has been gained. Only theoretical gains and memorization for memorization's sake.
- jeena 13y ago
  It sounds like to be save one should only use <div> and <span> tags, style them with CSS and forget about semantics? It is obvious to me that this is the wrong approach. And I have never said he should use <figcaption> I said he should use appropriate HTML5 tags. If something is obviously a header, use <header> if not, don't. But building everything out of <div>s like it was in his first example code is just making it more difficult to read, there is no gain in just using <div> for everything.
  - tuxracer 13y ago
    "It sounds like to be save one should only use <div> and <span> tags, style them with CSS and forget about semantics?" Yeah exactly. "It is obvious to me that this is the wrong approach." Semantic HTML essentially boils down to "You should because you should." "I said he should use appropriate HTML5 tags." To what practical benefit aside from personal aesthetic preference? "there is no gain in just using <div> for everything" The gain is not having to memorize or reference which semantic tag goes where, nor having to go back and refactor or maintain semantic tags.

by jeena 13y ago

c2prods 13y ago

The code is just cleaner with HTML5 markup. I've updated the project, it's more readable this way :)

tuxracer 13y ago

That's very different. Because there are circumstances where not knowing or applying math is a barrier to accomplishing something. Saying "Why should I learn math, I will never use it anyway." means you're banking on the odds that you will never run into those circumstances. However when it comes to semantic HTML there is no circumstance where you are unable to move forward because you used <div> instead of <figcaption>. In fact thanks to the sometimes ambiguous descriptions of which semantic tag is appropriate you may find you used the wrong semantic tag which is arguably worse than not using a semantic tag at all. And at the end of the day after carefully cross referencing and/or memorizing which semantic tag to use throughout your markup zero real world, practical effect has been gained. Only theoretical gains and memorization for memorization's sake.

jeena 13y ago
It sounds like to be save one should only use <div> and <span> tags, style them with CSS and forget about semantics? It is obvious to me that this is the wrong approach. And I have never said he should use <figcaption> I said he should use appropriate HTML5 tags. If something is obviously a header, use <header> if not, don't. But building everything out of <div>s like it was in his first example code is just making it more difficult to read, there is no gain in just using <div> for everything.
- tuxracer 13y ago
  "It sounds like to be save one should only use <div> and <span> tags, style them with CSS and forget about semantics?" Yeah exactly. "It is obvious to me that this is the wrong approach." Semantic HTML essentially boils down to "You should because you should." "I said he should use appropriate HTML5 tags." To what practical benefit aside from personal aesthetic preference? "there is no gain in just using <div> for everything" The gain is not having to memorize or reference which semantic tag goes where, nor having to go back and refactor or maintain semantic tags.