> John LaForge, who writes for Nukewatch, correctly notes that there is no "safe" level of exposure to radioactivity. We don't know that. Not only there may be

> John LaForge, who writes for Nukewatch, correctly notes that there is no "safe" level of exposure to radioactivity. We don't know that. Not only there may be a safe level of exposure, there may be a beneficial level[1]. Any rigorous experiment would be obviously unethical so we're just guessing here. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_hormesis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_hormesis