3 ms·
Yes, you are right. Here's the relevant documentation from Mozilla. "Extensions that are installed this way include the Java Quick Starter extension for Firefo
by solutionyogi 17y ago
Yes, you are right. Here's the relevant documentation from Mozilla.
"Extensions that are installed this way include the Java Quick Starter extension for Firefox (see above), the Microsoft .NET Framework Assistant [13] [14] the RealPlayer Browser Record Plugin extension, [15] and the Lenovo ThinkVantage Password Manager extension for Firefox [16] [17]. Although you can disable the extension in the Add-ons manager, the Uninstall option may not be functional (it will be "greyed out). In such cases, experienced users can uninstall the extension by removing the associated Registry entry and/or the contents of the folder containing the extension; otherwise, simply disable it."
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Uninstalling_add-ons#Windows_Registry_extension http://kb.mozillazine.org/Uninstalling_add-ons#Windows_Regis...
Microsoft has an article about how to remove this extension:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/963707/ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/963707/
From the same KB article,
"In Windows 7 and in a forthcoming update for the .NET Framework 3.5 SP1, the .NET Framework Assistant will be installed on a per-user basis. As a result, the Uninstall button will be functional in the Firefox Add-ons menu."
I am using Windows 7 right now and I can verify that I do see that Uninstall button is functional.
http://imgur.com/gX5c8.png http://imgur.com/gX5c8.png
BTW, this just goes to show the kind of reputation Microsoft has achieved in the marketplace. When the uninstall button was disabled, no one thought that it could be problem in the way Firefox works. Everyone (including me) just assumed that it was Microsoft who is deliberately doing this. I don't know how can they possibly fix their image.
- Herring 17y agoIf you install an update & this annoying extension shows up, you say the update caused the annoyance. That's how it works. It's their fault for pushing the bug/feature & they still haven't taken it out. Regarding your other point, I think 1 high profile FOSS project (eg webkit, hadoop, V8 ) or would do a lot for microsoft's image among techies.
- tl 17y agoEven that option has limited PR value; Microsoft either uses their "shared source" licenses (and comes under fire for not using a more recognized license like GPL or BSD) or they use such a license and feed ammo to the "shared source is trap" crowd.
- Herring 17y agoWell either way they'll come under fire from that crowd. (And i'd agree it sort of is a trap.)
- nop 17y agoWhile not as high profile as any of the above they have committed to jQuery http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2008/09/28/jquery-and-microsoft.aspx http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2008/09/28/jquery-and...
- adw 17y agoHypertable's Microsoft, thanks to the Powerset deal.
- Herring 17y agoThat has potential. They should push it as a way to attack google's proprietary bits.