3 ms·

I don't get your point. PayPal works as a payment provider for IGG campaigns. If IGG is willing to absorb the risk, then PayPal, as their payment provider shoul

I don't get your point. PayPal works as a payment provider for IGG campaigns. If IGG is willing to absorb the risk, then PayPal, as their payment provider should as well. Or, if PayPal is not willing to follow through and act as payment provider for high-risk crowdfundings, then PayPal should not be payment provider for IGG campaigns. But the middle way, first offering payment through PP and then not cashing out the money just doesn't work in my eyes.

rmc 13y ago
You're presuming IGG and PP have the same risk calculation. IGG might be more willing to take on risk than PP.
- Xylakant 13y ago
  Then why does PP work as Payment Provider for IGG if they are so risk-averse?
  - gtirloni 13y ago
    Because PayPal has enough evidence that they will have resources to pull from IndieGoGo in case things go bad? IGG's risk to PP is much lower than MailPile's.