4 ms·
Congrats MediaGoblin team, this is one of my favorite open source projects. Keep up the awesome work :D If anyone else is interested, I started a side project
by frewsxcv 13y ago
Congrats MediaGoblin team, this is one of my favorite open source projects. Keep up the awesome work :D
If anyone else is interested, I started a side project aimed at making MediaGoblin easy to install on Heroku:
https://github.com/frewsxcv/mediagoblin-heroku https://github.com/frewsxcv/mediagoblin-heroku
For the most part it works, but if any of you are Celery gurus, I could get it working the way I wanted.
- zeckalpha 13y agoIs the way MediaGoblin is imported what makes it okay to release this as MPL? I have a similar licensing situation for a GPL Python package I would like to use.
- frewsxcv 13y agoHeh. Honestly, I'm not sure. IANAL, but I think it would be okay considering MPL version 2 is a GPL compatible license https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPL#Compatibility_and_multi-licensing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPL#Compatibility_and_multi-li... That said, I tend to just pick MPL by default for my projects, but am not opposed to changing to make it compatible (not to mention there's hardly any code in the repo anyways)
- zeckalpha 13y agoIANAL either, but I believe. MPL can be imported by a GPL project, but not the other way around, as the importer would need to be licensed as GPL, too.
- belorn 13y agoFSF has a rather lengthy text regarding using MPL with GPL at http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#MPL-2.0 http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#MPL-2.0 I would agree with the above statement that MPL can be licensed as GPL, but not the other way around. However, I would follow the FSF advice in keeping MPL code MPL through dual licensing.
- orblivion 13y agoI tried messing with the Mediagoblin Openshift project, I think I've given up. Do you have video working on the Heroku one?