4 ms·
I disagree. Wikipedia links are very good, specially for informal discussions like this one. - The content is readable by most people without having to have sp
by huherto 13y ago
I disagree. Wikipedia links are very good, specially for informal discussions like this one.
- The content is readable by most people without having to have specialized knowledge on the subject.
- The content is open and reviewed by multiple people.
- You have links to the references. In this case there is a link to this NIH article.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2667526/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2667526/ But the content is more technical and harder to read for most people.
- epo 13y agoI said it wasn't authoritative, I said nothing about readability or openness, neither of which have anything to do with what is under discussion. I can provide plenty of UK links which refer to Down's syndrome.