4 ms·
Tinder has a rep of being more of a hook-up app (like Grindr) so having a web app may cause people to take this more seriously. This service looks like it uses
by Yhippa 13y ago
Tinder has a rep of being more of a hook-up app (like Grindr) so having a web app may cause people to take this more seriously. This service looks like it uses Facebook to do similar things like matching on profile data.
You're right about Tinder being dead-simple though. This looks like they basically took the Tinder concept and expanded on it for desktop viewing. One of the best parts about Tinder is that it really reduces the friction for people to talk to each other while still not being totally sketchy. That's the problem with most dating sites these days.
- s_q_b 13y agoYeah, My thinking is that hook-up apps will disrupt the dating site market by slotting in below and rising up, innovator's dilemma style. Grouper, Tinder, Grindr, et al. are the model I believe will actually bring online dating forward. The problem I have with most dating apps is that they try to change, rather than facilitate, normal dating patterns. When you meet someone in bar or at a party, generally all you have to go on is some brief conversation, and physical appearance (which, by the way, I'm getting sick of people saying is terrible. Physical appearance communicates far more than simple in-born beautify: from fashion to mannerisms to posture, there's a massive amount of communication that's non-verbal.) Tinder emulates that process pretty well. I just don't know the value in custom-written interest profiles that are at best inaccurate and at worst deliberately deceptive. What I want is a Tinder that emulates the flow of a date, all as part of the app's design: Matching algorithm->Picture (Vine or something would be better)->(yes/no)->Text conversation->(yes/no)->Audio Conversation->(yes/no)->drink/dinner