4 ms·
Sorry if that was opaque, but I'm trying to point out that you don't have to be obnoxious to be driven.
by agraphmaul 17y ago
Sorry if that was opaque, but I'm trying to point out that you don't have to be obnoxious to be driven.
- WilliamLP 17y agoI know that, but the question is if it can help? I don't think Wolfram is as significant as he thinks he is, but I think he's a lot more significant than a version without the obnoxious ego would be.
- agraphmaul 17y agoI can see two possibilities here. (1) You don't understand the distinction between having a big ego and being annoying. In this case I don't know what to say, except: thinking you're great doesn't necessitate telling everyone you're great. (2) You do get the distinction, and you're really arguing that, big ego or small, immodesty is desirable. Again, there's not a lot to say here: it seems possible that Wolfram's success has a lot more to do with creating Mathematica than with telling people he's smarter than they are. If your position is really that being obnoxious (as opposed to merely having self-confidence) is useful, and that we should therefore be obnoxious, then so be it.