4 ms·
I think the evidence presented with this article is at best inconclusive. So a couple of guys at the repair shop guessed it's a fake. The comparison flash is a
by lyndonh 13y ago
I think the evidence presented with this article is at best inconclusive.
So a couple of guys at the repair shop guessed it's a fake. The comparison flash is a couple of years old.
If on the other hand the author had sent the flash to Canon for repair and they said it was fake, then I would say he has proved it.
- gpvos 13y agoUh yeah, an official Canon repair shop. He writes about "Canon employees" later in the article.
- lyndonh 13y agoIn the article he talks as if the repair shop is the first place he took it to, only one month after buying it. Then later he says "This one had fooled camera repair shops, professional photographers and Canon employees for way longer than we all probably would care to admit". His story doesn't add up. If you read the comments you can see many people have Canon parts with serial numbers that start with a letter. Unless you think they are all fakes too. This is why I say inconclusive.