2 ms·
Actually, I misread your earlier post. Yes, what Facebook does is progressive rendering, but I disagree that it's the ideal since it's still blocked by JS. The
by jaffathecake 13y ago
Actually, I misread your earlier post.
Yes, what Facebook does is progressive rendering, but I disagree that it's the ideal since it's still blocked by JS. The ideal is serving HTML from the server which can get content on the screen before JS downloads.
"That is just built-in browser technology to achieve the same goal" - exactly. Tweetdeck does progressive rendering, but it avoids the simplest way of doing it and instead reinvents the technique with JavaScript. You can see what this does to performance.
- dasil003 13y agoThe point is that the perceived performance of Facebook is impossible to achieve with server-side rendering. Whether they should optimize for that 99.99% or the other 0.01% on philosophical grounds is a point you are free to debate. However the facts are the facts.