4 ms·
>Seriously: fuck wikis. They are bad and terrible. Personally I think the Arch Linux wiki does a fairly good job. I refer to it when setting up other Linux dis
by sirsar 13y ago
>Seriously: fuck wikis. They are bad and terrible.
Personally I think the Arch Linux wiki does a fairly good job. I refer to it when setting up other Linux distros.
- caw 13y agoI haven't checked out Arch's wiki, but the FreeBSD handbook is a similar thing. It's so well documented I use it to compensate for other documentation.
- yk 13y agoDepends, the Arch wiki is great, there is/was the German ubuntuusers.de wiki and of course Wikipedia, but none of these are designed to teach you the basics, they are references. By contrast, for tutorials the state of wikis is quite often tutorial 1-3 is great and the rest just missing.
- NoodleIncident 13y agoIt was a happy day the first time an Arch Wiki link popped up in my Linux Mint google results. That site is crazy good at documenting edge cases and possible bugs.
- 14113 13y agoThe arch wiki is absolutely incredible. I don't know how they've got it so good, but for a reference of all the things that can be layered upon linux it's amazing.