2 ms·
So maybe some racist white people might rate any area with black or Hispanic people as unsafe. Hopefully, if the area is actually not bad, some non-racist black
by nilkn 13y ago
So maybe some racist white people might rate any area with black or Hispanic people as unsafe. Hopefully, if the area is actually not bad, some non-racist black or Hispanic people will rate it as such. The positive and negative ratings should cancel each other out in such cases.
The areas that end up with negative ratings would have to be rated such by users of all ethnicities, which more or less rules out too strong a correlation with race here.
The only problem is if somehow only a single ethnic group, like white people, uses this.
So, basically, I don't think this is going to be an accurate source of information here. At the same time, if it were to actually get widespread usage, I don't think it would be as bad as some people are making it out to be.
Ultimately, though, why not use something like city-data? The site is ugly as sin but it has basically all the information you could ever want.
- mc32 13y agoWhy don't they just use FBI (or local) crime stats? Not subject to as much subjectivity. Drawback is that it may not be realtime up to date, but should be good enough.
- superuser2 13y agoCrimes are not always reported, especially when they are seen as relatively minor and commonplace compared to the murders probably also happening that day. Locals' informal guidelines to stay out of an area where you "don't belong" after dark may be so widely heeded that the number of assaults/robberies is low, but the probability of being mugged or beaten is still high.