3 ms·
When you say vanilla emacs, do you include the Cocoa version? (http://emacsformacosx.com/ http://emacsformacosx.com/) I'm using that many hours every day and h
by tazjin 13y ago
When you say vanilla emacs, do you include the Cocoa version? (http://emacsformacosx.com/ http://emacsformacosx.com/)
I'm using that many hours every day and have zero problems.
Regarding fullscreen, if you use a recent build both native and non-native fullscreen are supported.
- blueblob 13y ago+1 so funny, vanilla=cocoa...
- tazjin 13y agoI don't understand your reply. It is quite possible that somebody doesn't know that the Cocoa wrapper is a part of upstream emacs, which is why I asked.
- blueblob 13y agoI meant that I found it humorous that Cocoa (chocolate) was being described as "vanilla" on the platform. Purely language, not anything to do with the wrapper.
- singular 13y agoYes, I tried the cocoa version and that's what I'm referring to. I recall having real issues in particular with ansi-term not having the environment correctly set + simply not being able to resolve that. I'm pretty sure I had other issues too, but I can't remember them. To be fair, I've not tried the cocoa version or any other for some time, so things may have changed. However, I still think OP's point was unfair on aquamacs - other than some (annoying!) quirks regarding autofonts and tabs (I instantly turn those off), it's no different than emacs anywhere else, in my experience.
- intranation 13y agoPATH, exec-path etc. are mangled because of the way OSX loads environment variables. Here's an Emacs package that fixes that: https://github.com/purcell/exec-path-from-shell https://github.com/purcell/exec-path-from-shell