2 ms·
I would certainly say that a career in IT is defined by which track you choose. Are you familiar with the growing body of evidence that shows not many people ar
by karlkatzke 13y ago
I would certainly say that a career in IT is defined by which track you choose. Are you familiar with the growing body of evidence that shows not many people are employed in a fashion commensurate with their experience after the age of 40 to 45? That's equivalent to the partner track.
To review it slightly -- You either become a greybeard (partner), you become a manager (could also be considered a type of partner), you become a highly paid consultant but don't achieve your previous salary-equivalent. If you miss your mark and don't achieve one of those, either you wash out of the field, or you have a difficult time finding a place and when you do you accept one that is not in line with your experience. (ex: You were an AIX admin paid $120k/yr, now you are a contractor for Dell making 4-hour response service calls on server hardware.)
And I would also not say that a job at Google or Microsoft is for life (you get stack ranked out pretty fast at Microsoft as you age), nor would I say that the pay's that good unless you're really awesome. I've gotten SF Bay offers, and after you factor for cost of living changes, they're much less than I make for my current company telecommuting from central Texas.
- jessedhillon 13y agoYes, valid points. You should consider that most people who live in metro areas would consider it a significant degradation in quality of life to live in central TX. I would consider it similar to a decrease in pay.
- karlkatzke 13y agoHeh. It depends. For my lifestyle, it fits perfectly. Living in large cities or places where waiting in line is a frequent occurrence drives my blood pressure up. I'm only about an hour and a half from Austin if I want anything trendy (and my wristbands for ACL just arrived!); everything else comes in by Amazon.