3 ms·

> Your suggestion of HD+ literally means that this 13" device has less pixels than modern phones. Which isn't a problem in my opinion. 1080p on such a device m

> Your suggestion of HD+ literally means that this 13" device has less pixels than modern phones. Which isn't a problem in my opinion. 1080p on such a device means you have to scale up fonts and graphics elements to get to sthg like 1366x768 anyway (so things are actually readable). It's not about pixel counts, it's about usable optimal size for things displayed on the screen. Upscaling is bad because it requires more energy and heat more. HD+ or macbook air is enough for laptop resolution. I forgot to add a good lenovo keyboard (or good island style keyboard but not those mushy surface keyboard).

MichaelGG 13y ago
A: 1366x768 is especially junk, as 720p video is going to get slightly upscaled and blurred. So it's low-res and looks bad for video. B: Pixel doubling is a fine alternative. I recently saw a MacBook Retina, and I spent 15 minutes just reading colorized HTML because it was so shockingly good looking. Windows 8 (at least the WinRT side) supports scaling much better, and 8.1 is supposed to be able to do 200% (aka perfect) out of the box. So again, they're just lagging by not even offering the option. C: Not everyone has terrible eyesight. Lenovo offers no 1080p (or higher, like they IBM did) on anything less than their 15" device (and the 11" Helix, I think). There's no excuse for that. I'd be exceedingly content with 4K on a 12" X-Series. I'd be overjoyed even to get 1920x1200 on an X-Series.