3 ms·
Do you find WolframAlpha inflexible and unhelpful re: question phrasing?
My experience with WA has been disappointing. Although it sometimes shares a lot of interesting info, I experience little or no improvement for "ask Jeeves" sort of questions. It seems that there'll be quite a learning curve, and I am prone to turn elsewhere. How much more likely to be turned off is the (less-techie) public in general.
Here is the feedback I sent to WA (who have not responded to my earlier concerns). Perhaps HNers will have thoughts:
>When you aren't "sure what to do with your(my) input"... WA certainly is not helpful in designing a search.
>Today, for example, the news is hot with Dell's drop in sales. So I thought WolframAlpha might have links to stories comparing Dell with other manufacturers 2009 sales. Nope.
>I entered into WA: computer server sales 2009
>Result: nothing "Wolfram|Alpha isn't sure what to do with your input."
>I thought that was a pretty specific, objective request (per your "tips for good results").
>I would like to like WA... and have an alternative to Goog & MS. Are your marketers & user-interface people listening?
[/rant]
- ErrantX 17y agoSuch data is VERY new and so the chances of WA having it are low (the latest data I have seen is 08) Dont forget WA isnt really into "popular" data - searching for stuff relevant to whats happening "now" wont find you anything productive. It's a computational engine and statistical data engine. Also dont forget they only have 1000 data entry "experts".Only a teeny tiny percentage of useful data has been hand picked for inclusion yet. Plus the responses are mostly fairly strongly hardcoded and the AI is very bad at recognising your questions unless it is a very mathematical term (basically it appears to try to apply math to the phrase, and then falls back to hard coded, keyword based searches).
- fhars 17y agoAnd it isn't even very good at math. It knows about the microfortnight, but if you ask it for attoparsec per millifortnight, it parses it as (attoparsec / (1/1000))*fortnight which isn't even a speed. [Edit: typo, why is there no preview?]