2 ms·
I'm not saying the article is right either, since it is a rather bold claim. But it is just as one sided to write it off as stupidity, because JavaScript is dyn
by kalms 13y ago
I'm not saying the article is right either, since it is a rather bold claim. But it is just as one sided to write it off as stupidity, because JavaScript is dynamically typed - or whatever. I can't force anyone to like JavaScript, nor would I like to, but my personal experience does lend some credence to OP from where I'm sitting.
I think the biggest problem with OP's claim is the lack of true enterprise software written in JavaScript. I can't think of anyone, besides a few lightweight SaaS applications.
We're currently building a large-scale application for public schools here in Scandinavia, but it is augmented by a .NET service backend. I hope we'll get a swing at a full-stack solution soon.