3 ms·
So your comments have nothing to do with testing in clojure or even code level automated testing in general, and this is just you telling 'most developers' that
by engrenage 13y ago
So your comments have nothing to do with testing in clojure or even code level automated testing in general, and this is just you telling 'most developers' that you think they should work with QA more?
- taeric 13y agoWell... I jumped in at the discussion pivot regarding the concern over "writing fewer tests" being difficult. My point was simply if you want some good leads on which tests you need to focus on, coordinate with QA. Development shops tend to work in isolation to QA. Often, there is a sense of hostility between the groups. This makes zero sense. So, my point is to emphasis that all of the tools my direct pivot discussed were not necessarily created by the pilots/doctors/etc. Instead of the emphasis being on "having smart programmers that write lots of tests," lets move it to "having programmers that focus tests on problematic areas with insite gained from other teams." (That make sense?)