It just reeks of phoniness. Look, here's the query he wrote in the article: http://www64.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=how+many+calories+in+one+ounce+sugar+and+one

It just reeks of phoniness. Look, here's the query he wrote in the article: http://www64.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=how+many+calories+in+one+ounce+sugar+and+one+cup+butter+and+one+milky+way+bar http://www64.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=how+many+calories+in+... Sure enough, it works. So modify it oh-so-gently: http://www64.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=how+many+calories+in+one+ounce+sugar+and+one+ounce+sugar http://www64.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=how+many+calories+in+... And it's utterly confused. It's the same frickin' thing, but simpler. Oh, but it helpfully suggests this: http://www64.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=calories+in+one+ounce+sugar+and+one+ounce+sugar http://www64.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=calories+in+one+ounce... Which also confuses it. Why suggest something that you're going to fail on?