5 ms·

I still think Netflix is sapping some of the fun and vitality out of their original series by putting all the episodes up at once. Is binge-watching great? Of c

by lukifer 13y ago

I still think Netflix is sapping some of the fun and vitality out of their original series by putting all the episodes up at once. Is binge-watching great? Of course it is! A huge library of great shows to binge-watch is one of the Netflix's biggest selling points. But getting it all at once is like peeking at your Christmas presents early: you think you want it, but it spoils some of the fun, the eventy-ness of it, and the social context created by a shared timeline (the so-called "water-cooler effect"). Anyone who doesn't want that experience can still wait until the whole thing is out, probably just a few months, at which point it will still be available in the binge library, presumably forever. (I know some who prefer not to start a new series at all until the entire thing is finished, which is also okay.)

avalaunch 13y ago
Anyone who doesn't want that experience can still wait until the whole thing is out, probably just a few months, at which point it will still be available in the binge library, presumably forever. (I know some who prefer not to start a new series at all until the entire thing is finished, which is also okay.) Likewise, I could say that anyone who doesn't want to watch them all at once doesn't have to. You can choose to watch only 1 episode a week.
- werid 13y ago
  the problem is that these people tend to enjoy discussing "this week's episode" with their friends, and that's hard when they've watched the entire season/series.
  - Tyrant505 13y ago
    This discussion of an ep or event in series happens regardless... You are just defending a timescale based on an old model as a reason for it to exist.
    - deleted 13y ago
      [deleted]
L_Rahman 13y ago
This is a very significant issue that I think should make Netflix re-evaluate their initial release model. For me, and for a significant number of attentive television fans, a big part of the experience is reading the nightly discussion post by our favorite reviewer and discussing the episode with everyone in the comments section. I'm part of the very active AVClub community and teasing out what happened with the everyone else who just watched the episode greatly enhances the viewing experience. For FX's The Bridge whose lead character falls within the autism spectrum, a certain commenter who is also on the autism spectrum writes a few hundred words that illuminates what it's like going through life in a very different way from most others. I have learned a great deal in the process, and it's something that is possible only because one episode is available per week. If they were dumped at once, maybe I'd rush through the whole thing at once, or she would and this exchange would never have happened.
chewxy 13y ago
Not really. I found that shows like Person of Interest, Continuum or even bits of Fringe are best watched in a row. I would say American TV production schedules of 24 episodes a season is the bits that are killing TV watching. I would definitely not mind 6 episodes per season of high quality entertainmen (aka British TV production schedule). I wouldn't know about the water-cooler effect because I've never actually experienced discussing with other people last night's TV.

by lukifer 13y ago

avalaunch 13y ago

Anyone who doesn't want that experience can still wait until the whole thing is out, probably just a few months, at which point it will still be available in the binge library, presumably forever. (I know some who prefer not to start a new series at all until the entire thing is finished, which is also okay.) Likewise, I could say that anyone who doesn't want to watch them all at once doesn't have to. You can choose to watch only 1 episode a week.

werid 13y ago
the problem is that these people tend to enjoy discussing "this week's episode" with their friends, and that's hard when they've watched the entire season/series.
- Tyrant505 13y ago
  This discussion of an ep or event in series happens regardless... You are just defending a timescale based on an old model as a reason for it to exist.
  - deleted 13y ago
    [deleted]

L_Rahman 13y ago

This is a very significant issue that I think should make Netflix re-evaluate their initial release model. For me, and for a significant number of attentive television fans, a big part of the experience is reading the nightly discussion post by our favorite reviewer and discussing the episode with everyone in the comments section. I'm part of the very active AVClub community and teasing out what happened with the everyone else who just watched the episode greatly enhances the viewing experience. For FX's The Bridge whose lead character falls within the autism spectrum, a certain commenter who is also on the autism spectrum writes a few hundred words that illuminates what it's like going through life in a very different way from most others. I have learned a great deal in the process, and it's something that is possible only because one episode is available per week. If they were dumped at once, maybe I'd rush through the whole thing at once, or she would and this exchange would never have happened.

chewxy 13y ago

Not really. I found that shows like Person of Interest, Continuum or even bits of Fringe are best watched in a row. I would say American TV production schedules of 24 episodes a season is the bits that are killing TV watching. I would definitely not mind 6 episodes per season of high quality entertainmen (aka British TV production schedule). I wouldn't know about the water-cooler effect because I've never actually experienced discussing with other people last night's TV.