4 ms·
>single moms who don't get anything for their children. Which is good, because then there's no incentive to produce many children just to cash in their basic i
by jk4930 13y ago
>single moms who don't get anything for their children.
Which is good, because then there's no incentive to produce many children just to cash in their basic income. Being a single mom in Western nations is mostly a business model anyway (either the father or state has to pay and considering that more than 70% of break-offs are initiated by the woman), and it usually results in children who are more prone to become criminals and dropouts.
- guard-of-terra 13y agoWe can disincentivize having each next children so our family converges on "mom, dad and 2-4 children", which would be pretty nice actually won't it? While building some savings for those children, larger when there's a lot of them. Western nations sponsor single moms and get a surplus of single moms, that's what BIG ends.
- consonants 13y ago>Being a single mom in Western nations is mostly a business model anyway Can you expound on this?