So, suppose the secular humanists get their way and we remove religion as a class but ethnicity and race are. Would that mean that advocating violence against

So, suppose the secular humanists get their way and we remove religion as a class but ethnicity and race are. Would that mean that advocating violence against Jews would be a problem but against Atheists would be ok? But at that point, do we have a problem where people are not equally protected under the laws? This may seem manufactured, as a hypothetical and it is, but one can come up with plenty of cases where such would not. For example, if one advocates killing anyone with a felony drug record, this would hit blacks much harder than whites. One could effectively advocate genocide by attacking proxy issues like this just as one can effectively discriminate in such a way (why the EEOC has generally held that blanket policies of not hiring convicted felons are racially discriminatory). But if you go to such analogies, I think you have a problem. I don't think that hate speech bans are compatible with equal protection under the laws.